The story is about what had happened just before
and after an Engineer was given the pink slip.
Once upon a time, in a workplace not so far far
away, there was an engineer who joined a tech firm. He was smart,
enterprising and a bright individual. To many it appeared that his
only passion was to do his work with unflinching dedication.
Few months passed. Naturally, he was a top performer
and earned his place in the team. Few of his team members admired him for his
work ethics; few others for his charm. However most of them liked his
brilliance at work.
Many a times, he went a great distance to get things
done. Along the way knowingly or unknowingly, he stepped on others’ feet,
called ‘Spade a Spade’, ticked off the wrong people in the organization chain
and even ended up being stonewalled on a few occasions.
Though he produced great results, the perception was
that he was a tough guy to work with. His immediate bossed kept warning him
about the perceptions that built around him. He believed that he was correct
most times. He also knew that his behavior was less than appreciated on some
occasions.
However, he was barely successful in changing the perception around
him. Life became miserable for him and also the folks he worked with. The most
unfortunate situation was that his admirers were also among his detractors.
Amidst all this workplace politics, his well-wishers
and the admirers he earned stayed true to him. Warned him of impending danger,
tried there best to help him.
Over the course of time, his detractors decided to put
an end to the misery. They were waiting for one failure to make their move. One
bad day at work, he missed an engineering deadline and snapped at one of the
colleagues from the management chain. The knives were out. Allegations flowed;
he was crucified in front of the HR. It was like his detractors were waiting
for a chance to fix things.
Fired!!!
He was devastated. It was like his career had
come crumbling down. For his admirers, the management’s move came as a rude
shock. By the time they realized what had happened, he was gone. The HR had
already escorted him out of the building.
Professional conduct and bad performances were sighted
as reasons for the pink slip. Some employees believed the reasons the
management provided them for this termination. Others did not. The same
colleagues who recommended his termination were also among the folks who felt
sad for the poor engineer.
The day was gone, weeks passed. The organization had
moved on. People forgot what had happened.
One fine day, a few of his colleagues found out that
he was working in one the biggest firms in the tech industry. He was leading a
happy life.
Looking
back at the management decision to show the door, no doubt it was a bitter
episode. They made a choice and there was bad blood. It was never a question of
who was right or wrong. A hard decision had to be taken, and someone made it.
In
the end, life moved on for everyone.
1. Quite right. Losing a job is not end of life.
ReplyDelete2. A leader is not identified only by his skills or hard work, but also from his ability to share credit for successes AND to own responsibility for failures.
3. A leader has to continually acquire knowledge and share it with his team. The take-away to the team is knowledge and not increment (rarely both).
4. A leader is recognised not by his qualifications but by his qualities.
In your example, the guy succeeded in 1, but not in 2,3 and 4. Actually, his continued success is a lesson for his detractors, but his failure here is a lesson for himself.
Life is a great leveller.
Yes, probably the guy learned from his mistakes. Talking about leaders, I just realized that this story is also similar to Steve Job's before he was ousted from Apple in the 1980s
DeleteGood post. It leaves the analysis and conclusion to the reader.
ReplyDeleteYa, that was the initial idea. But intentionally left clues at the end of the post, to give an idea on how I saw the story.
DeleteSimilar your earlier comment, there are so many inferences and conclusions. Will a follow up analysis post be good? or should I leave it open for analysis?
I think it should be open for analysis, so newer thoughts can flow.
ReplyDelete